Is it correct to say that Dijkstra reasoned linguistically during the late 1950s and early 1960s? A reviewer of the research paper `Dijkstra's Rallying Cry ...' expressed his reservations about this matter.
In the reviewer's own words:
Here is what a reviewer had to say about the research paper `Dijkstra’s Rallying Cry ...':
The paper is, in essence, about an argument of generality versus computer efficiency. The argument was eventually settled in favour of the former due to the enormous advances in electronic technology. Today, computer efficiency is not an issue any more.
Is this correct? The last sentence seems to contradict Martin Reiser’s “law” which states that
© 2011–today by the respective authors. All rights reserved.